Few could have imagined the impact
of Columbus' discovery of a spice so pungent that it rivaled the better
known black pepper from the East Indies. Nonetheless, some 500 years
later, on the quincentennial anniversary of the discovery of the New
World, chili peppers (Capsicum) have come to dominate the world
hot spice trade and are grown everywhere in the tropics as well as in
many temperate regions of the globe. Not only have hot peppers come to
command the world's spice trade but a genetic recessive non-pungent
form has become an important "green" vegetable crop on a global scale
especially in temperate regions.
The New World genus Capsicum is a member of the Solanaceae, a
large tropical family. Various authors ascribe some 25 species to the
genus but this is only an estimate with anticipated new species to be
discovered and named as exploration of the New World tropics expands.
Exploration and plant collecting throughout the New World have given us
a general but false impression of speciation in the genus. Humans
unconsciously selected several taxa and in moving them toward
domestication selected for the same morphological shapes, size, and
colors in at least three distinct species. Without the advantage of
genetic insight these early collectors and taxonomists named these many
size, shape, and color forms as distinct taxa giving us a plethora of
plant names that have only recently been sorted out reducing a long
list of synonymy to four domesticated species. The early explorations
in Latin America were designed to sample the flora of a particular
region. Thus, any collection of Capsicum was a matter of chance
and usually yielded a very limited sample of peppers from that area.
Only with the advent of collecting trips designed to investigate a
particular taxon did the range of variation within a species begin to
be understood. One needs only to borrow specimens from the
international network of herbaria to appreciate what a limited sample
exists for most taxa, particularly for collections made prior to 1950.
The domesticate Capsicum pubescens, for example, that is
widespread in the mid-elevation Andes from Colombia to Bolivia, is
barely represented in the herbarium collections of the world. Most
herbarium collections of Capsicum, with the exception of
Capsicum annuum holdings, are woefully inadequate. Furthermore,
besides Capsicum annuum, very little attention has been paid to
the many cultivars of each of the domesticated species. Often material
is unusable because it was collected only in fruit neglecting the most
important and critical characters associated with floral anatomy and
morphology. With the advent of germplasm collecting programs during
the past three decades, and concomitant improvement in herbarium
collections we have come to better understand the nature of variation
in the genus Capsicum. The increasing number of Capsicum
herbarium specimens permits renewed interest and debate on the proper
One of the more perplexing
questions regarding the taxonomy of Capsicum is defining the
genus (Eshbaugh 1977, 1980b; Hunziker 1979). The taxonomy of the genus
Capsicum is confounded within certain species complexes, e.g.
C. baccatum sensu lato. Major taxonomic difficulties
below the species level in other taxa, e.g. C. annuum, also
exist. Armando T. Hunziker (unpublished) is currently working on a
revision of the genus. What taxa are ultimately included in
Capsicum may indeed change if the concept of the genus is
broadened to include taxa with non-pungent fruits but with other common
morphological and anatomical traits such as the nature of the anther,
the structure of nectaries, and the presence of giant cells on the
inner surface of the fruit (Pickersgill 1984).
Capsicum, as presently perceived, includes at least 25 species,
four of which have been domesticated (Table 1).
An understanding of each of these domesticates is instructive when
trying to appreciate their origin and evolution. The data from plant
breeding and cytogenetics confirm that the domesticated species belong
to three distinct and separate genetic lineages. Earlier studies
suggested two distinct lineages based upon white and purple flowered
groupings (Ballard et al. 1970) but an evaluation of more recent data
argues for the recognition of three distinct genetic lineages.
Although the barriers between these gene pools may be broken down this
rarely, if ever, occurs in nature.
forms a distinct genetic lineage. This pepper, first described by Ruiz
and Pavon (1794) never received wide attention from taxonomists until
recently (Eshbaugh 1979, 1982). Morphologically, it is unlike any other
domesticated pepper having large purple or white flowers infused with
purple and fruits with brown/black seeds. Genetically, it belongs to a
tightly knit group of wild taxa including C. eximium (Bolivia
and northern Argentina), C. cardenasii (Bolivia), and C.
tovarii (Peru). Capsicum pubescens is unique among the
domesticates as a mid-elevation Andean species. Capsicum
pubescens is still primarily cultivated in South America although
small amounts are grown in Guatemala and southern Mexico, especially
Chiapas. This species remains virtually unknown to the rest of the
world. A small export market seems to have reached southern
California. Two of the major difficulties in transferring this species
to other regions include (1) its growth requirements for a cool, freeze
free environment and long growing season and (2) the fleshy nature of
the fruit that leads to rapid deterioration and spoilage.
Capsicum baccatum var.
pendulum represents another discrete domesticated genetic line.
Eshbaugh (1968, 1970) notes that this distinct South American species
is characterized by cream colored flowers with gold/green corolla
markings. Typically, fruits are elongated with cream colored seeds.
The wild gene pool, tightly linked to the domesticate, is designated
C. baccatum var. baccatum and is most common in Bolivia
with outlier populations in Peru (rare) and Paraguay, northern
Argentina, and southern Brazil. This lowland to mid-elevation species
is widespread throughout South America particularly adjacent to the
Andes. Known as aji, it is popular not only as a hot spice but for the
subtle bouquet and distinct flavors of its many cultivars. This
pepper is little known outside South America, although it has reached
Latin America (Mexico), the Old World (India), and the United States
(Hawaii). It is a mystery as to why it has not become much more wide
spread, although the dominance of the Capsicum annuum lineage
throughout the world at an early date may be responsible.
Capsicum annumm var. annumm--Capsicum Chinense
Pickersgill (1988) has stated that
"the status of Capsicum annuum, C. chinense, and C.
frutescens as distinct species could legitimately be questioned."
Several authors have previously raised this issue culminating in the
observation that "at a more primitive level one cannot distinguish
between the three species. On the one hand we treat the three
domesticated taxa as separate while the corresponding wild forms
intergrade to such an extent that it is impractical if not impossible
to give them distinct taxonomic names" (Eshbaugh et al. 1983). McLeod
et al. (1979, 1983) have argued that isoenzyme data make it impossible
to distinguish between these three taxa. From an extensive isoenzyme
study of these three taxa and several other species, Loaiza-Figueroa et
al. (1989) argue that "thus far, this substitution of alleles
constitutes a good argument against the proposal that these species
form an allozymically indistinguishable association of a single
polytypic species" as advanced by Mcleod et al. (1982, 1983) and
Eshbaugh et al. (1983) in their published studies. Nonetheless,
Pickersgill (1984) has pointed out that "each domesticate intergrades
with morphologically wild accessions by way of partially improved
semidomesticates. Any subdivision of the wild complex into three taxa,
each ancestral to one of the domesticates, becomes decidedly arbitrary,
although clusters corresponding to wild C. annuum, C.
chinense, and wild C. frutescens can be detected." Clearly,
Loaiza-Figueroa et al. missed the point of these earlier papers which
argue for the complexity of the problem noting that the real difficulty
comes as one approaches the more primitive forms of these taxa.
Furthermore, the Loaiza-Figueroa et al. (1989) dendrogram (p. 183)
suggests that the number of C. chinense and C. frutescens
taxa included in their study is insufficient to reach any definitive
conclusion regarding the status of these three taxa. There is a very
close relationship of these three taxa based on crossing data from
several studies (Smith and Heiser 1957; Pickersgill 1980). Stuessy
(1990) has observed that "the ability to cross does not just deal with
a primitive genetic background; it deals with the degree of genetic
compatibility developed in a particular evolutionary line." As Stuessy
(1990) has inferred there can be no stronger argument for relationship
than the data obtained from plant breeding. Regardless of one's
viewpoint, it is clear that the C. annuum--C.
chinense--C. frutescens complex has been and continues to be
a most difficult taxonomic morass. Some preliminary information from
the studies of Gounaris et al. (1986) and Mitchell et al. (1989)
suggest that molecular data may be useful in resolving this and other
taxonomic questions. For the present, I have chosen to recognize the
Capsicum annuum complex and the Capsicum chinense complex
as two distinct domesticated species. Where C. frutescens fits
into this scenario remains to be resolved. William G. D' Arcy, A.T.
Hunziker, and others may solve the problem by merging the three taxa
under a single taxonomic entity. Taxonomists and formal taxonomy are
having a very difficult time coping with what is a complex and dynamic
evolutionary process. The problem is heightened by the economic
importance of Capsicum and the requirement that not only the
domesticated species be named properly but that the several cultivars
receive taxonomic recognition.
Capsicum annuum is the best known domesticated species in the
world. Since the time of Columbus, it has spread to every part of the
globe. The non-pungent form, bell pepper, is widely used as a green
vegetable. Another non-pungent form, "pimento," is also present
throughout much of the globe. The hot spicy forms of this species have
come to dominate the spicy foods within Latin America and the rest of
the world. Capsicum annuum probably became the dominant pepper
globally in part because it was the first pepper discovered by Columbus
and other New World explorers (Andrews in press). This taxon was the
first Capsicum species taken to Europe and quickly spread to
Capsicum chinense was also discovered at an early date and
spread globally but to a lesser extent than C. annuum. The more
limited global expansion of this species is most probably related to
its later discovery in South America and the competitive edge enjoyed
by C. annuum which was firmly established in the Old World
before C. chinense was introduced there.
A discussion of the geography of
Capsicum touches on two questions. The first relates to the
origin of the genus Capsicum and the second to the origin of the
domesticated taxa. The area of origin of Capsicum cannot be
resolved until we understand the nature of the genus. If we accept the
genus as currently circumscribed and limited to pungent taxa, then a
clear center of diversity is to be found ranging from southern Brazil
to Bolivia (McLeod et al. 1982; Eshbaugh et al. 1983; Pickersgill
1984). However, if the genus is reconstituted to include other
non-pungent taxa, another center of diversity may be recognized in
Central America and southern Mexico. Ultimately, our definition of the
genus Capsicum and what species it includes will determine our
view of its center of origins and whether the genus is monophyletic or
polyphyletic. The emerging molecular studies of J.D. Palmer and R.G.
Olmstead should give us a better sense of where Capsicum belongs
within the framework of the Solanaceae.
Determining the place of origin of the genus and each of the
domesticated species is at best a problematic exercise. In 1983, I
stated that "it appears that the domesticated peppers had their center
of origin in south-central Bolivia with subsequent migration and
differentiation into the Andes and Amazonia." This is a condensation
of a highly speculative hypothesis (McLeod et al. 1982). From that
hypothesis Pickersgill (1989) later suggested that I (Eshbaugh 1983)
argued that all the domesticated taxa arose in Bolivia. Without
question, I could have stated this idea more clearly. We (McLeod et
al. 1982) have speculatively hypothesized that Bolivia is a nuclear
center of the genus Capsicum and that the origin of the
domesticated taxa can ultimately be traced back to this area. That does
not imply that each of the domesticated species arose in Bolivia.
Clearly, evidence supports a Mexican origin of domesticated C.
annuum while the other domesticated species arose in South America.
Nonetheless, the ancestry of the domesticates can be traced to South
America. While McLeod et al. (1982) have hypothesized a Bolivian
center of origin for Capsicum there is no evidence for a
polyphyletic origin of the genus as now understood.
Evidence suggests that C. annuum originally occurred in northern
Latin America and C. chinense in tropical northern Amazonia
(Pickersgill 1971). Capsicum pubescens and C. baccatum
appear to be more prevalent in lower South America. Thus, at the time
of discovery, the former two species were exploited while the later two
species awaited a later discovery and remain largely unexploited
outside South America today.
In considering the question of origin of each particular domesticated
species two issues must be considered. First, what wild progenitor is
the most likely ancestor of each domesticated species and second, where
is the most probable site of domestication?
Capsicum pubescens ranges throughout mid-Andean South America.
An analysis of fruit size of this domesticate indicates that fruits of
a statistically smaller size occur in Bolivia, while fruits from
accessions outside Bolivia on the average are somewhat larger
suggesting that Bolivian material approaches a more primitive size
Eshbaugh (1979, 1982) has argued that the origin of this domesticate
can be found in the "ulupicas," C. eximium and C.
cardenasii. Clearly, these two taxa are genetically closely related
to each other and C. pubescens. Natural hybrids between these
taxa have been reported and evaluated (Eshbaugh 1979, 1982).
Furthermore, the two species that show the highest isoenzyme
correlation with C. pubescens, C. eximium and C.
cardenasii, occur primarily in Bolivia (Eshbaugh 1982; McLeod et
al. 1983; Jensen et al. 1979). All three of these taxa form a closely
knit breeding unit with the two wild taxa hybridizing to give fertile
progeny with viable pollen above the ninety percent level. Crosses
between the wild taxa C. eximium and C. cardenasii and
the domesticate C. pubescens most often show hybrid pollen
viability greater than 55%. These factors lend to the conclusion that
domesticated C. pubescens originated in Bolivia and that C.
eximium--C. cardenasii is the probable ancestral gene pool.
This does not prove that these two taxa are the ancestors of C.
pubescens but of the extant pepper taxa they represent the most
logical choice. One perplexing question remains to be investigated and
that is the origin of the brown/black seed coat in domesticated C.
pubescens, a color unknown in any of the other pepper species.
Capsicum baccatum var. pendulum is widespread throughout
lowland tropical regions in South America. It ranges from coastal Peru
to Coastal, Brazil. The wild form, recognized as C. baccatum
var. baccatum, has a much more localized distribution but still
ranges from Peru to Brazil. These two taxa have identical flavonoid
(Ballard et al. 1970; Eshbaugh 1975) and isoenzyme profiles (McLeod et
al. 1979, 1983; Jensen et al. 1979) and are morphologically
indistinguishable except for the overall associated size differences
found in the various organ systems of the domesticated taxon (Eshbaugh
1970). The wild form of Capsicum baccatum exhibits a high
crossability index with domesticated C. baccatum var.
pendulum with the progeny typically exhibiting pollen viability
in excess of 55 percent (Eshbaugh 1970). The greatest center of
diversity of wild C. baccatum var. baccatum is in Bolivia
leading to the conclusion that this is the center of origin for this
Can we ever unscramble questions about the origin and evolution of the
C. annuum--C. chinense--C. frutescens species
complex? Pickersgill (1989) states that there is an "overwhelming
likelihood of at least two independent domestications of the chile
peppers of this complex." She also notes that one "may ... argue about
whether wild forms of this complex should really be assigned to
different species, and indeed whether domesticated C. annuum and
domesticated C. chinense are really conspecific." I would agree
that the evolutionary lineage of C. annuum--C.
chinense--C. frutescens complex is intimately linked but I
would further emphasize that when, where, and how they diverged is
obscured in antiquity and that the extant wild forms of these three
taxa are so similar as to make them very difficult to separate. One
might well ask whether, at a minimum, C. chinense and C.
frutescens are conspecific or grades within the same species.
In contrast, a reasonably clear picture emerges on origin and
progenitor of C. annuum. Capsicum annuum has its center
of diversity in Mexico and northern Central America with a local, and
more recent distribution in parts of South America. The wild bird
pepper, Capsicum annuum var. aviculare, ranges from
northern South America (Colombia) into the southern United States and
Caribbean. Crossing studies indicate that the wild bird pepper is
genetically the most closely related taxon to domesticated C.
annuum (Emboden 1961; Smith and Heiser 1957; Pickersgill 1971).
Pickersgill (1971), using karyotype analysis, suggests that the origin
of domesticated C. annuum is to be found in southern Mexico.
Pickersgill et al. (1979) also provided a detailed phenetic analysis of
the C. annuum--C. chinense--C. frutescens complex
and the difficulty of separating these taxa at the most primitive level
Capsicum chinense remains the least understood of the four
domesticated taxa with respect to center of origin and probable
progenitor. If one maps the range of forms in C. chinense, it is
clear that amazonian South America is the center of diversity of this
species. Furthermore, C. chinense does occur sporadically
throughout the Caribbean. It is likely that C. chinense spread
into the Caribbean at a later date since the diversity of taxa is more
limited in that region than in amazonian South America. In considering
the progenitor of C. chinense, one is bewildered by the
evidence. It has been suggested that C. frutescens, in its
primitive form, may be the ancestor of C. chinense (Eshbaugh et
al. 1983). However, one needs to ask whether C. frutescens is
merely a weedy offshoot of C. chinense or C. annuum. It
is clear that the three species, C. annuum, C. frutescens, and
C. chinense, hybridize with each other. They form a
morphological continuum especially at a primitive level (McLeod et al.
1979). Genetic evidence from isoenzymes also confirms the close
relationship of these three taxa (McLeod et al. 1983; Jensen et al.
The spread of domesticated peppers
throughout the world during the 500 years since discovery is truly a
phenomenon. Two of the domesticated species, C. annuum var.
annuum and C. chinense have been widely utilized on a
global scale. Both C. baccatum var. pendulum and C.
pubescens have been extensively exploited in South America but
remain largely confined to that market. Given both the unique
qualities and flavors of these later two species they each represent a
potential source for future development.
Of special interest to those working with peppers is the use and
exploitation of the wild species. Wherever wild taxa of
Capsicum occur, humans use them for their hot properties. In a
few cases, exploitation of wild species has reached a commercial level.
Capsicum praetermissum is collected and sold commercially in
parts of Brazil (reported by correspondents). Capsicum chacoense
and C. eximium are collected and bottled and marketed throughout
southern Bolivia (pers. observ.). Fresh C. cardenasii is
harvested and transported to the La Paz, Bolivia market for sale (pers.
observ.). In Mexico and the southwestern United States wild C.
annuum var. aviculare, the chiltepin, has been locally used
for many years (Nabhan et al. 1989). More recently, a commercial
market has developed for chiltepin. A large amount of this wild
species is now harvested and sold to the gourmet food market. Nabhan
et al. (1989) indicate that "currently chiltepin is almost completely
wild harvested." They note that "as much as 12 tons of chiltepines may
be harvested from a single Sonoran municipio in a good year, but total
harvest may vary from perhaps 8 to as high as 50 tons."
While the quantity of C. eximium, ulupica, being harvested in
southern Bolivia is unknown, there is an extensive commercial trade in
bottled whole peppers. Bolivians have not attempted to commercially
plant wild plants of C. eximium, but Nabhan et al. (1989)
indicate that incipient cultivation of C. annuum var.
aviculare was initiated with extensive planting of the chiltepin
by Sonoran farmers in the 1980s. The manipulation of these two wild
species in each setting has led to some significant changes for the
wild species. In both the case of C. annuum var.
aviculare and C. eximium, larger fruit size has been
selected for in the incipient area of cultivation and manipulation.
Sonoran farmers are selecting for larger fruit size in the wild
chiltepin. In C. eximium, there is a statistically significant
larger fruit form of this ulupica in the zone of exploitation when
compared to regions where the fruit is not widely collected (Eshbaugh
1979, 1982). In both cases we are witnessing incipient or
semi-domestication of the wild species.
Apparently, a market exists for the exploitation of peppers for the
medicinal properties of capsaicin and several companies are pursuing
such investigations. Two of the more interesting products to come to
market in the last five years are the prescription drug Zostrix
(Genderm registered trade mark), an analgesic cream, containing 0.025%
capsaicin that is used topically to treat shingles and to provide
enhanced pain relief for arthritis patients and Axsain (GalenPharma
registered trade mark) that contains 0.075% capsaicin and is used for
relief of neuralgias, diabetic neuropathy, and postsurgical pain. Both
products are believed to work by action on a pain transmitting compound
called substance P.
Several pepper species, because of their unique fruit shapes and bright
fruit colors, have been widely used as ornamentals. The presence of
capsaicin, however is a potential hazard.
In August, 1980, an expert
consultative group, under the auspices of the IBPGR (International
Board for Plant Genetic Resources), met at CATIE (Centro Agronomico
Tropical de Investigacion y Ensenanza) in Turrialba, Costa Rica, to
discuss the status of Capsicum germplasm collections and to map
a strategy for future collecting and management of these resources
(Genetic Resources of Capsicum 1983). The discussions led to a plan to
systematically collect Capsicum throughout New World paying
particular attention to the wild species most closely related to the
domesticated taxa. The efforts of the past decade have resulted in a
significant accumulation of pepper germplasm (seeds) that is now stored
in various collections. Eshbaugh (1980a, 1981, 1988) has detailed the
history of Capsicum germplasm collecting prior to 1980 and
discussed the collecting efforts of peppers in Bolivia. Capsicum
germplasm collections are now maintained in a number of facilities in
the United States, as well as Mexico, Costa Rica, Bolivia, and